While watching a rather interesting documentary about female sexuality, the scenes of which made me reminisce vividly about my days as a honorary girl and the hours of girl-talk I have been privileged to be part of, I discovered that apparently the digit ration between the index finger and the ring finger in both females and males of the human species is a clear sign of fertility. According to the professor, or doctor or what ever the hell he was: if the male’s ring finger is longer than his index finger, he has/is:
- A higher testosterone count as an infant, prior to birth.
- A longer cock, apparently.
- A more systematic mind.
- Is more fertile than men whose index fingers are longer than their ring fingers.
4.
In females this apparently works the opposite way. If the index finger of a woman is longer than her ring finger, then she is more fertile than women whose ring fingers are longer.
This isn’t exactly a credited science just yet; it’s more than likely too closely related to palmistry for some people. I simply found the information interesting.
We’ve all heard the stories of “if a guy has big feet, or big nose, big hands, or the length between his thumb and little finger. All of those are naturally false. It seems however that some scientist are saying that you can be sure of if a man has a large cock or not, depending on the relation between his ring finger and index finger. If he has marketed longer ringfinger then he has a longer dick.
I found this partially fascinating, as women subconsciously tend to favour men with longer ring fingers, and those men tend to smell better according to women, as well as have more intelligence - absolutely intriguing.
Due to my own history, I have quite extensive measurements of my own cock, and due to my girlfriends tendencies to become nymphs around me, I know a fair bit about the average ratio of dick sizes. If I remember this correctly, most males fall between 14-15 centimetres in length, 58% of them actually. The largest percentile of men in circumference was between 9 and 10. My own measurements lie quite a bit higher than those.
Along with about 1.9 percent of all men, I am in the 21-22 centimetre in length, and in the circumference I can’t tell you, because the statistics table I checked these figures for only went as high as 14,5 centimetres around, which was in the 0.3% if I remember correctly. I myself, fall in the 16 centimetre circumference spectrum however which is apparently quite unusual.
Interestingly viewing my hand from above (the way you look down on your own hand) my right hand’s ringfinger appears to be 7 millimetres longer than the pointer for that hand. ON the left hand the difference was 6 millimetres. I took theses measurements from just above the knuckle to the tip of my fingers. Due to the difference between the fingers, and because it matched my cock measurements, it brought me to a funny theory that probably has absolutely no merit, but I think I’ll mention it anyway.
Basically my idea was that the difference in length for my right hand (7mm) could be translated into centimetres difference from the norm in cock length. And in the case of my left hand (6mm) it would be the centimetres difference in circumference.
In other words, according to my fingers i would be 14-15 + 7, in length and 9-10 + 6 in circumference. In my case this obviously pans out. Though I highly doubt this theory of mine actually holds water for anyone else, it would be fun to know for sure.
I should mention that the way in which I measured is not the “correct” way to go about it. You’re supposed to measure with the palm upwards, from tip to the line closest to the palm.
When I follow how to take the measurement “correctly” and doing a bit of math, my actual ratio is 0.94 which is quite low. The lower the ratio, the longer the ring finger is in relation to the index finger. So while it still says I have a large dick, I can’t use my theory to figure anything out. It was still fun to create a little brain teaser for myself.
No comments:
Post a Comment